These days there are monkeys that pose questions in the following manner...."Does the judgement in the recent Anwar defamation case against Utusan mean that the Judiciary is corrupt? Or perhaps it is not corrupt because it had ruled against the opposition?"
Aiyoh.....Monkey the issue in court in that particular case was whether the article in question had defamed Anwar. That was it. It was not a Government vs Opposition thing as you have articulated. Silly monkey.
Secondly just because we have some judges who are bold and are able to decide without fear and favour do not make the entire judiciary clean. If you recall just recently the Bar Council had lodged a formal complaint with the MACC regarding corruption charges levelled against a recently retired Court of Appeal judge.
Monkey surely you feign ignorance when you conveniently forget what Judge Syed Ahmad Idid had alleged in the 90's or even as to what Justice Kamil had said in the Likas election judgement? Do you recall a certain "correct, correct, correct" incident not too long ago? Amnesia monkey?
Hello monkey please get your head out of that pile of dung that you seem to have stuck your head into! Get your facts correct and write with some form of decency and honesty! Or is that too much to ask?
As i have challenged you before i am still ready for a public debate with you on matters you have written on previously. Who is monkey you ask? Ahhh.... you know who you are monkey. Call me.
Cheers
MV Nathan
No comments:
Post a Comment